apandist belirtileri ishale ne iyi gelir trafik sigortası depresyon testi

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/alexwilk/public_html/wp-content/themes/thematic/library/extensions/header-extensions.php:7) in /home/alexwilk/public_html/wp-content/themes/wilkie/header.php on line 99

Warning: simplexml_load_file() [function.simplexml-load-file]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Temporary failure in name resolution in /home/alexwilk/public_html/wp-content/themes/wilkie/header.php on line 100

Warning: simplexml_load_file(http://www.kadinbilgi.net/feed) [function.simplexml-load-file]: failed to open stream: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Temporary failure in name resolution in /home/alexwilk/public_html/wp-content/themes/wilkie/header.php on line 100

Warning: simplexml_load_file() [function.simplexml-load-file]: I/O warning : failed to load external entity "http://www.kadinbilgi.net/feed" in /home/alexwilk/public_html/wp-content/themes/wilkie/header.php on line 100

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/alexwilk/public_html/wp-content/themes/wilkie/header.php on line 101

Doing Intervention and Enacting the ‘Everyday’

I’m organising a seminar at Goldsmiths entitled:  Doing Intervention and Enacting the ‘Everyday’: How Users Figure in Innovation Projects

Speakers: Torben Elgaard Jensen & Morten Krogh Petersen

(The Technical University of Denmark)
16th May 2012 | 16:30 ~ 18:30
NAB LGO1 (New Academic Building)
Goldsmiths, University of London
New Cross, London
SE14 6NW, UK
This seminar will include two 30 minute presentations (abstracts below) followed by a discussion.

Intervention By Invitation
Torben Elgaard Jensen
Over the past three decades, STS has increasingly moved from a position of often ‘studying up’ to a position of often ‘being invited’ into scientific, technological and political projects. As a consequence, more and more STS researchers now find themselves having access not only to the sites, but also at times to the discussions and the decisions. With these new points of entry, the key question about intervention may no longer be if STS will be heard, but rather how the contributions from STS will combine with those of other participants in joint projects. The article investigates how Danish STS researchers were invited to intervene under the auspices of a national programme to promote user-driven innovation, and how they gradually developed new versions of the well-established conceptions of the users known from the STS literature. The new versions of the user raised higher hopes about the innovative potential of users, and evoked deeper fears about elusive publics and disloyal customers. Finally, the article considers the peculiar ‘middle management’ position that STS researchers may hold as mediators between users and projects, and it proposes the term ‘intervention-as-composition’ to designate the type of intervention that may result from mediating between previously unconnected actors.

The everyday enactment of “the everyday” in an innovation project
Morten Krogh Petersen
The everyday is often believed to hold an important key to innovation. Hence, private and public sector organizations alike are currently developing a keen interest in descriptions of the everyday lives of users, consumers, citizens, employees etc. (Thrift 2006; Cefkin 2009; O’Dell & Willim 2011). Through a wide range of methods and activities, everyday lives are laboriously scrutinized and attempts are made at bringing the resulting descriptions into innovation processes. Scholars within the field of STS on innovation and users have noted this development and conceptualize the everyday in different and programmatic ways (e.g. Akrich 1992; Suchman, Blomberg et al. 1999; Halse, Brandt et al. 2010; Pantzar & Shove 2010). But what is this everyday and how, more precisely, is it handled in innovation projects? The paper develops the argument that the everyday is by no means an unproblematic field of investigation ready for scrutiny and subsequent utilization in innovation projects. It does so through a close analysis of how the everyday is studied, enacted and handled in a Danish, government supported user-driven innovation project concerning work practices at an outpatient clinic. The analysis shows how different versions of the everyday at the clinic are enacted and handled in the innovation projects different user involving activities. It is argued that this handling of the users’ everyday is an important aspect in understanding how innovation happens – or not – in contemporary innovation projects. Actually, finding ways of handling the everyday innovatively may be one of the crucial challenges of current user-driven innovation projects.

Speaker Bios
Torben Elgaard Jensen is a senior lecturer at the Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark. He has studied the organization of innovative activities for a number of years, drawing on organization theory and science and technology studies. His current research focuses on the practical ways in which companies construct knowledge about their users and on the current Danish efforts to develop a national innovation policy with an emphasis on so-called user-driven innovation. He is an editor of Science Studies and the chairman of the Danish Association for Science and Technology Studies (DASTS).
Morten Krogh Petersen holds a post.doc position at the Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark. His current research takes the ongoing promotion of user-driven innovation in Denmark as a point of departure. It seeks to offer close descriptions of the specific, material-discursive practices of operating users and knowledge about users in innovation projects. In doing so, insights are combined from the fields of science and technology studies, organization studies and ethnology. He defended his doctoral thesis on government communication and the multiplicity of current public administration and management in June 2011.

Posted in Centre for the Study of Invention and Social Process, Design, Events, Goldsmiths, Interaction Research Studio, Seminar Series, STS | Comments closed

Participatory Moves as Parasitic

ertBot: a twitter research bot for understanding energy demand reduction practices on the web.

On June 1st I’m giving a keynote lecture at the IT University Copenhagen as part of the workshop ‘Participatory Moves as Parasitic Relations in Senior Healthcare‘. My keynote is entitled ‘Noisy Engagements’ and I will be reflecting on the the interventionist forms of research we have been conducting as part of the Energy & Co-Designing Communities research project. In particular, I will be talking about twitter bots as a form of action research and drawing on Michel Serres’ notion of noise and the parasite to provide a theoretical gloss. The workshop also features Steve D. Brown, from the University of Leicester, Joachim Halse, from the Danish School of Design, Casper Bruun Jensen, from the IT University Copenhagen, Peter Danholt, from Aarhus University as well as other notable scholars of design and STS.

Posted in Conference, Design, Invention and Energy Demand Reduction: Co-designing Communities and Practice, Scandinavia, STS | Comments closed

Early Issue Mapping: GM Food Debate

Design & Media Research Fellowship, Jan van Eyck Akademie, Maastricht, 1999-2000

Just found a PDF of one of the early govcom.org issue visualisations that we designed in Maastricht, as part of the Media and Design Fellowship at the Jan van Eyck Academie.

Here’s how govcom.org cite the visualisation:

Govcom.org, “GM Food Debate Map,” Design & Media Research Fellowship, Jan van Eyck Akademie, Maastricht, 1999-2000, inserted in Preferred Placement. Revised 2005

Here’s a link to the PDF:

GM Food Debate Map

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Legible Landscapes Deployment

The Interaction Research Studio deployed a number of indoor weather stations at Browns cafe in Brockley on the 31st of March. The devices, designed to make visible indoor micro-climates, will be with the volunteers for a number of weeks. Studio members will be studying the domestic climate data produced by the devices as part of their research into exploring sensor technology, visibility and interactivity.

Posted in Design, Interaction Research Studio, Legible Landscapes | Comments closed

Javier Lezaun at CSISP

Javier Lezaun gave a presentation entitled ‘Cinematography and the Discovery of Social Kinetics’ as part of the New In Social Research Seminar series hosted by CSISP, Goldsmiths. The CSISP blog provides a report as well as an audio download of his talk.

Posted in Centre for the Study of Invention and Social Process, Goldsmiths, Seminar Series, STS | Comments closed

SPEAP visits CSISP

Here’s a post on the CSISP blog reporting on the recent visit of the The Programme in Experimentation in Art and Politics (SPEAP) at Science Po (Paris) to the Centre of Invention and Social Process at Goldsmiths.

SPEAP students on the Warmington Tower roof Terrace. Photograph © 2012 Jorge Castillo

Posted in Centre for the Study of Invention and Social Process, STS | Comments closed

On Location

A Falun Gong follower stages a peaceful protest opposite the Chinese embassy in London. Photograph © Alex Wilkie 2012

I’m running the brief ‘On Location’ with first year BA Design students at Goldsmiths. The brief encourages the students to identify and understand a specific site in London and then design an intervention for that site. As part of this, I will be asking the students to consider ethnographic approaches to sites as well as ethnomethodological understandings of ordinary action.

Posted in Design, Goldsmiths, Teaching | Comments closed

Studio Studies: Ethnographies of Creative Production

The electronic display for the Prayer Companion, Interaction Research Studio. Photograph © Alex Wilkie 2012

 

Together with Ignacio Farias, I am organising an open panel at the EASST/4S meeting in Copenhagen this year. Here’s some details:

Dates: 17-20 October 2012
Location: Copenhagen
Website: http://www.4sonline.org/meeting
Deadline for submission of abstracts: 11 March 2012

Given the importance placed on ‘creativity’, ‘creative economy’ and ‘creative industry’ in both national and international policy contexts, it is surprising that understanding of creativity-in-action remains largely underdeveloped. What is more surprising is that creativity is commonly associated with (unobservable) cognitive activity that can only be stimulated by the environment, which has led many scholars to see social networks and/or urban environments as the main sources for creativity. What gets lost here are the concrete practices through which the ‘new’ comes into being in different disciplines and in different economic sectors. In foregrounding the view of creativity as a local process distributed amongst heterogeneous actors this panel seeks to explore and compare accounts of sites of creative practice. Our insight is that the studio is a defining feature of creative production. Thus, building on workplace and laboratory studies this panel aims to draw together emerging ethnographic work on creative practice and in doing so define and investigate a lacuna in the STS imagination. To address the studio, as a key site of creative production, we welcome presentations based on in-depth case studies that focus on key ‘creative industries’, including the arts, crafts and cultural and creative industries. Accordingly, this panel invites comparison of different creative models and practices, thereby acknowledging the diversity of in-situ creative practice as well as providing a survey of different creative disciplines.

A not exhaustive list of themes:
·       The sociospatial organisation of the studio.
·       Socio-material practices of affect, sense and sensation.
·       Disciplinary & interdisciplinary work.
·       Problematisation and the form of projects.
·       The role of (visual) inscription and conscription devices.
·       Practices and technologies of imagination, conception, and projection.
·       The role and production of creative knowledge.
·       Testing, evaluation and accountability.
·       Newness, uniqueness and originality.
·       User-involvement in creative production.
·       Economic and temporal processes.

Please submit your abstract electronically via the webpage of the conference: http://www.4sonline.org/meeting

The deadline for abstract submissions is March 11.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

My Best Fiend. On the Productivity of Intellectual Enmities

Seminar series organised by Michael Guggenheim

 

Michael Guggenheim (Sociology, Goldsmiths) has organised a seminar series entitled ‘My Best Fiend. On the Productivity of Intellectual Enmities’. The seminar series is being held at Goldsmiths in room RHB 137 and includes the following speakers: Liz Moor (1. Nov), Harry Collins (8 Nov), David Oswell (6. Dec) and Steve Fuller (13 Dec).

Posted in Centre for the Study of Invention and Social Process, Seminar Series, STS | Comments closed

CSISP Blog

Photograph sourced from the CSISP blog.

The Centre for the Study of Invention and Social Process (CSISP), hosted by the Sociology Department at Goldsmiths, has a new blog. You can find it here.

Posted in Centre for the Study of Invention and Social Process, STS | Comments closed
apandist belirtileri ishale ne iyi gelir trafik sigortası depresyon testi asd